DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No. 00359-12
27 February 2012
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
16% Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF eRe ST RE ee ee
Ref: (aj) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/033
of 24 Jan 12
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was
advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September 2009 Navy -wide
advancement exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 21 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No. 00359-12
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September
2009 Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of
16 June 2010, anda Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
A. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN 3. HESSY III
Recorder Acting Recorder
Br Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Whang
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dirett
24 February 2012
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03710-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08601-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/AM1 from the February 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00601 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/LS2 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00379 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/HT3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/HT3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5391-13
Be DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO05391-13 16 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy el Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11006 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/CTR3 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10607 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-5/MA2 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...